Mick Wallace How in God's name can joining #NATO be in interest of people of North Macedonia? - More unnecessary spend on Milit… https://t.co/lC29IWtLbJ
Mick Wallace The #US could only treat #Cuba as it does with the complicity of the #EuropeanUnion - which cuts a sad figures as… https://t.co/js5TJIEJH8
Mick Wallace RT @mhdksafa: 925 healed in Italy in the last 24 hours. I see no one sharing. If they were dead, everyone would share! Share positivity...…
Mick Wallace People of #Palestine could only envy the type of lockdown that #Israel introduced to stop the spread of… https://t.co/4KLAtl0qr7

Dáil Diary no 31- 14th April 2015

No Peace without Justice - Ireland should champion International Human Rights…

On Thursday April 2nd, I introduced a new Bill in the Dáil, the Universal Jurisdiction of Human Rights Bill 2015. If passed, it would allow a situation where action could be taken against any person who has breached International Human Rights, and have that individual brought to trial. We hear much talk of “terrorism” these days, but we tend to overlook the reality that in the world today, more terrorism is carried out by States rather than individual groups, which we refer to as terrorists. Sadly, the perpetrators of State terrorism are rarely held to account. This Bill could help to address this problem, if we had the appetite and courage to do so. It was interesting that the Minister across the floor from me in the Dáil at the time, Minister Brendan Howlin, couldn’t help interrupting when I was speaking - clearly not keen on the idea of having individuals like Tony Blair, George Bush, Vladimir Putin or Barack Obama brought to trial for their war crimes. No doubt, in a previous life, before the same Minister joined the powerful elite, he most likely had a different take on this issue. Well, we do know what they say about Power. Here’s my Dáil contribution –

“The Bill seeks to enable the charging and conviction of persons who breach international human rights law in cases of genocide, war crimes, torture and crimes against humanity, whether these breaches have occurred inside or outside the State. Universal jurisdiction can play a crucial part in the quest to obtain international justice for those who have suffered horrendous crimes.

 There are two types of universal jurisdiction. The first type can be enacted when a person who has breached international human rights enters the territory of a state which wishes to charge him or her. The offender's presence grants the state this universal jurisdiction. The second type of universal jurisdiction is practiced in absentia. This occurs when the person in question is not present in the state for the trial, but is tried for the crimes regardless. Spain, Germany, Belgium, France and Britain have long had universal jurisdiction statutes, which allow their national courts to pursue and prosecute war criminals. However, there is an unspoken rule in the West never to use international law against each other. This changed in 1998, when Spain, supported by France, Switzerland and Belgium, indicted the Chilean dictator, Augusto Pinochet, and sought his extradition from Britain, where he was having an operation. John Pilger has made the point that had Pinochet been sent for trial, he almost certainly would have implicated at least one British Prime Minister and two US Presidents in crimes against humanity. He was not extradited. Although unsuccessful, this attempt by Spain should be commended.

  It has also been argued that the use of universal jurisdiction by states has lost some of its relevance since the creation of the International Criminal Court, which was established as a permanent court for cases of genocide, war crimes, torture and crimes against humanity. However, the court has been a disaster since its inception in 1998. An example of this is the record number of petitions the court has received for Tony Blair to stand trial for war crimes. He has yet to be called before the court. How surprising. Mr. Blair was partially responsible for the deaths of more than 1 million people, has created almost 4 million refugees and has caused untold misery in the Middle East region, through the invasions of Afghanistan in 2011 and Iraq in 2003. He lied to both the British public and Parliament in the run up to the invasion in Iraq in 2003, claiming that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. He later got to work for the US, EU and UN as a Middle East envoy. I must be missing something. Ireland has become complicit in some of these war crimes by allowing the United States to use Shannon Airport as a military air base. More than 2.25 million troops have passed through on their way to wars which have led to more than 1 million deaths.

  There have been many crimes against humanity, such as the mass murders in Rwanda and the slaughter by Suharto in Indonesia, the US in Vietnam, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and the Israeli defence forces in Gaza. There have been stories of families, wedding parties and whole villages being wiped out in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Libya and Yemen by the US, initiated by Barack Obama, George W. Bush and NATO forces. There have been reports of the disappearance of students in Mexico.


Deputy Brendan Howlin: Would the Deputy include ISIS?


Deputy Mick Wallace: I would definitely include ISIS, and would throw the Russians in too, given that Russia has committed some serious crimes.


Deputy Brendan Howlin: Excellent.


Deputy Mick Wallace: There has been much debate recently in the Chamber regarding the issue of Irish neutrality. Sadly, we are not neutral, but have taken sides, and the Irish people are becoming more aware of this. It would be great if we could become a leader, not a follower, in the international community. The implementation of universal jurisdiction in Irish law would give us the power to try war criminals such as Tony Blair, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Binyamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin for their horrendous crimes. I came across a quote from Henry Kissinger on universal jurisdiction:
Any universal system should contain procedures not only to punish the wicked but also to constrain the righteous. It must not allow legal principles to be used as weapons to settle political scores.

It is interesting that he said this, given that he was largely responsible for the deaths of 600,000 innocent people in Cambodia, when the US bombed the living daylights out of the country between 1969 and 1973. He is wanted for questioning in France, Chile and Argentina on these charges. Later, he said universal jurisdiction was a breach of each state's sovereignty, which translates as, the US can do what it likes when it likes where it likes, and if people do not like it, tough.


This is a good reason for us to introduce the Bill and stand up for human rights and justice.

 - Mick Wallace

Good heartiness is a result of proper supply and hygiene. How can medicaments hels up? Circumstances that can influence your choice when you are buying medications are various. Below are basic reasons about cialis vs levitra vs viagra which one is better. Surely there are also other momentous questions. Choosing the perfect treatment option for a racy disease can get really confusing considering the advantages and disadvantages of the existing treatment methodologies. When you buy remedies like Cialis you have to have in mind about levitra vs cialis vs viagra. The most significant thing you must look for is which works better viagra or cialis or levitra. A long list of prescription drugs can lead to erectile disfunction, including many blood pressure medicines, pain remedies, and most of antidepressants. Sometimes the treatment options may include erectile dysfunction remedies or hormone treatments.

namaleaks

THE TRUTH IS COMING....

Namaleaks is a project that seeks to uncover possible injustice and poor practice related to NAMA (National Asset Management Agency) and financial institutions in Ireland.

VISIT THE WEBSITE

Back to Top